Miscarriage of Justice Essay -- sensational criminal trials

Arguably three of the closely sensational nefarious trials in American history are the Commonwealth vs. Borden, California vs. Simpson and Los Angeles vs. Rodney King. entirely three of these cases received unprecedented amounts of media attention and verdicts from the jury that shocked the country. In my whimsy justice, especially social and moral justice, was not achieved in these trials. Social class, function and gender all had a huge impact on the jurys decisions in each of these cases. High priced defense attorneys were able to place fairish doubt in the minds of the jurors despite the substantial amount of evidence proving the seemingly obvious guilt of Borden, Simpson and the Los Angeles Police department. This paper will focus on these criminal trials and the fact that justice or moral rightness was not achieved by the outcome of the jury verdicts.The trial of Lizzie Borden, in June of 1893, captivated the nation. It was c everywhereed extensively in newspapers through out the country probably, in part, because it was extremely rare for a woman to commit a horrific act such as the one she was criminate of. Being from a wealthy family that outwardly seemed happy and normal, made it very difficult for people to believe that a woman with her background could be obligated for the bludgeoning death of her father Andrew Borden, a predominate member of town, and her stepmother Abby Borden. The police, however, came to the conclusion that the Bordens murderer must have been someone within the home since the house was other than untouched, nothing was missing and there was no sign of any commotion. The only person having both the motive and opportunity to commit these murders was Thirty three course old Lizzie Borden.Here are some intriguing fa... ...ing was awarded a 3.8 million dollar settlement. This case, however, will surely haunt the LAPD indefinitely and caused further contention among an already distrusting, leery minority population and law e nforcement.In conclusion, these extraordinary criminal trials hold their place in history as some of the most palpable miscarriages of justice. In all three cases, it is almost impossible to comprehend the enormity of the evidence convicting each of the defendants. These trials prove that peoples intrinsic preconceive notions regarding the way in which certain people are apt to behave can have more of an influence on an individuals opinion than solid evidence. I believe the defendants discussed in this paper were guilty of the crimes brought against them. It is a shame that our court system allows procedure and regulation to take precedence over justice.